Old Mc Donald had a farm - Part 4: Homeopathy in nature

Modern homeopathy, the treatment of disease using like to affect like, grew out of the work of German physician Samuel Hahnemann. The original definition involved the neutralization of a disease by the introduction of a corresponding pattern in a phase or mode that neutralizes it. However, it is also possible to introduce a new pattern or strengthen an existing pattern by using a phase or mode of that pattern which reinforces it.

The modes or phases of homeopathic medicines are determined by serial dilution and potentiating, commonly using water as the medium. Other hydrogen-bonding media such as alcohol, vegetable oil or milk sugar are also used. In general, anything that hydrogen-bonds, has a memory for patterns.

These dilutions are called “homeopathic potencies.” The pioneering work of Lily Kolisko and Jean Benveniste shows that each successive potentiating step introduces a phase or mode change in the pattern. If we think of these patterns in the simplest two-dimensional fashion, we can represent them as waves.

Each farm (as well as any company, grocery shop, super market or hospital) has its own unique blend of information fields. We have found that homeopathic potencies work well in achieving a higher blend and better balance, as well as supplying missing components so as to achieve the optimum health for that farm. We rarely use the lowest potencies because their patterns are too cluttered up with the substances from which they are derived, and the phase relationships aren’t clearly separated. Results are therefore uncertain and tend to be overwhelming. Raw substances may also be toxic. But many toxic substances, such as arsenic — which is harmful in a coarse, substantial way — can be desirable at the appropriate potency in a fine, homeopathic form.

Webster’s defines reagent as a substance used in preparing a product or in developing photographs. In informational circles this definition is extended to indicate not so much the substance itself as its pattern of information. Every substance from the most rudimentary hydrogen atom on up has its pattern or signature, as with hydrogen’s emission and absorption spectra. Thus, “reagent” in this context means the pattern used in creating an effect rather than the substance used in preparing a product. Some examples are colors, sounds, symbolic circular patterns, homeopathic remedies and written intents. Water is renowned for its ability to carry such patterns, so it often is used as the medium in making reagents. However, it is the pattern, not the water, which is actually the reagent.

Old Mc Donald had a farm - Part 3: About cosmic pipes and patterns

Galen Hieronymus, who lived in Lakemont, Georgia, invented a method of inducing patterns into the soil. He called it a Cosmic Pipe, and called the mode of organized energy involved eloptic energy. In reality he used the information from the information fields creating and directing energy as earlier explained. The terminology might seem obscure, but Hieronymus’ creation worked with (what he thought) the organizational energies of Steiner’s remedies and could induce patterns over large acreages. No spraying, no heavy tractors in wet weather belching diesel fumes, with nozzles clogging up. Thanks to the work of Mike Lovell many farmers made trials of Hieronymus’ cosmic pipe on their farm and market garden for more than10 years.

In the beginning the design worked exclusively on the soil, but downward patterns built up so strongly that magnesium, potash, boron, copper and zinc flushed into the water table, along with the nitrates and chlorides. Digestive patterns climbed above the soil into the atmosphere. Tomato crop rotted before it ripened for six straight years, a week earlier each year.

Peppers kept getting leggier, and fruit set declined. At the worst point, ripening was delayed by six weeks. Wheat, barley and corn had bad fungal problems. Most important however was that something was going on! Good or bad, but something had changed. The process needed to be fine tuned that’s for sure! Further research showed that a two-stage broadcaster would be more efficient.  After all, the patterns in the atmosphere were just as important as those in the soil.

Today, field broadcasting is revolutionizing agriculture. If this goes further, fertilization will gradually decline, particularly the use of nitrogen fertilizers. Moreover, today it has been possible to broadcast patterns that “turn off” specific weed and insect pests, so field broadcasting could also foreshadow the end of toxic agriculture. Its safety, simplicity and low cost ensures that anyone who uses it appropriately will refuse to go back to the dangerous, arduous and expensive practices of the past. Today reliable and well-constructed field broadcasters are produced that can cover up to 2,000 acres.

Old Mc Donald had a farm - Part 2: hardly anybody knows this!

For roughly 100 years it was believed that plants could only absorb nitrogen in crude form as ammonium, urea and nitrate. In fact, when a plant takes in water, these salts are so readily absorbed that they may block the uptake of more complex nitrogen compounds. But plants exude complex sugars and amino acids into the soil, and as long as conditions permit, they can also absorb them.

Nitrate uptake makes plants salty and watery— they must convert crude nitrogen into amino acids before they can use it. Their cells, bloated with water and salt, are then susceptible to diseases. In general, flavor and nutrition suffer, and such crops fall short of their genetic potential.

And watch out, because now it comes:

Their chemistry is shifted to short-chain amino acids, which insects require, and which are therefore responsible for the use of insecticides!

And so you see how the applications of one chemical industry are responsible for the creation of another. The use of soluble fertilizers is therefore responsible for the use of pesticides. Even if we are very far away here from X7 and X8, or even from Kosyrev and Co, no farmer will believe you, even when in this case the chemistry involved under-standing this mechanism is very basic! You even don’t need to be an informational leader to find out, just a bit of questioning and chemistry in our material dimensions (X1 – X2 – X3) will give you this answer very rapidly. Just being a little contrary (do you remember?) and a “don’t follow the crowd” attitude is already enough to obtain such stunning results!

What about manure? Every managing-farmer will try to convince you that manure is so precious, but is that really true? Some quick X1 through X3 research teaches us the following:

Feeding carbon compounds to the soil’s teeming micro-ecology, plants ensure their nutrient uptake will be as near to the needs of their protoplasm as possible, (and now it comes!) raw manure is notorious for producing soluble phosphorus levels that are toxic to mycorrhizae, which really defeats the system. But even stable compost, when applied in large quantities, is everywhere, whether the desired crop has any roots there yet or not!

Also here, no farmer or gardener will believe you, because that is not what big institutions such as the chemical industry has been t(s)-elling him for many years! Try to find out from the farmer how he knows when he puts too much or not enough manure on his fields? I’m keen to hear the answer!

Now that we have shown the value of even some simple research, it’s time to show some “real” informational leadership.

There has been made some stunning informational research in agriculture, especially in the US and Australia. The rest of the world has may be reached a certain level of awareness regarding the so called bio-culture, but that’s it! They haven’t managed the step towards the informational level. Strange enough the way to informational farming has been shown by a German called Rudolf Steiner. 

We have experienced the validity of informational farming in Australia, where we gave some classes and workshop in the greater area of Wagga Wagga in 2010.

www.matrix-information.com

Old Mc Donald had a farm - Part 1: Keep on spraying!

Imagine a big farm where they grow corn, beets, potatoes and other vegetables.  We are in spring and nature does its job. What is the farmer’s main activity? Does he watch his stuff growing, and waits until August-September to become active again? Certainly not! He has three major activities:

·         Spraying fertilizers,

·         spraying insecticides, and

·         spraying herbicides. 

Everybody will tell you that this is normal (same procedure as last year!), and all farmers in the industrialized world are doing this for generations. They even teach future farmers at school when, where and what to spray. Apart from lots of expensive machinery, the farmer has his kids and several workers helping out on the farm; in other words he is managing a capital intensive operation (and mostly highly indebted). One of his biggest problems is the weather dependency, each year a black box! In other words, every penny is needed. No fancy offices, cool suits or fast cars, but instead: hard work.

Apart from new chemicals or more powerful (and expensive) spraying equipment, there is nothing new under the sun. With all my respect to those managing-farmers but is this informational leadership? It certainly isn’t. We will show you how to develop profitable and innovative leadership and how every managing farmer could change his situation and become an informational leader!

But this example is applicable to many industrial organizations, so please try to understand this metaphor and translate it into your own particular environment! So, are you ready? Here we go!

Each managing farmer will tell you that it is normal and of great necessity that chemical fertilizers and pesticides are used. On the question if the use of those two product groups are related, the answer will be: No, not at all!

An informational leader would not answer, but question the issue itself. After some research work, he would soon find out that it was only after chemical fertilizers came into vogue that pesticides came into use! Why was that? He would soon find out that there was an intimate connection between soluble fertilizers and pesticides.

When you look up the word “fertilizer” in the dictionary you will find following definition:”A substance used to make the soil more fertile”! Pretty wrong, the informational leader would say. Impossible to believe that soluble salt nutrients, especially chlorides and nitrates, will make the soil more fertile! On the contrary: those products damage soil biology and ultimately reduce fertility. Potassium muriate consists of 40% Chlorine, and surely kills soil microbes. Nitrogen salts inhibit and kill Nitrogen fixing azotobacters (indicators of good soil).